The laws of the state where the insured had a permanent home at the time of his death To determine whether Claimant is an insured individual’s widow, the agency looks to Things, that she is the widow of an insured individual. To be entitled to WIB under Title II of the Act, Claimant must establish, among other Entitlement to Widow’s Insurance Benefits Under the Social Security Act Name (J~) to B~ to match the NH’s last name.Ī. In February 1964, the agency processed a name change for Claimant from her maiden Which was in conformance with the Quaker marriage process. The individuals who signed the marriage certificate were QuakersĪnd, by signing the certificate, they acknowledged that they witnessed the marriage, Of Claimant and the NH, and the signatures of the more than 200 attendees who witnessed Provides information including the date of the marriage, the names and signatures Over 200 signatures of those who attended the ceremony. The NH, Claimant submitted to the agency a Quaker Marriage Certificate containing License from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In her application for benefits, Claimant averred that she and the NH were marriedīefore a “clergyman or public official.” Claimant and the NH did not obtain a marriage United in a Quaker Ceremonial Marriage before an officiant in Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. On October XX, 1963, Claimant and the NH were In that application,Ĭlaimant averred that she and the NH lived at the same address at the time of hisīoth Claimant and the NH are Quakers. On September XX,Ģ021, Claimant filed an application for WIB on the NH’s record. The NH died on December XX, 2020, while domiciled in Pennsylvania. The NH were in a valid marriage and that Claimant is the NH’s widow for purposes ofĭetermining entitlement to WIB on the NH’s record. Moreover, we believe that the Pennsylvania courts would likely find that ClaimantĪnd the NH entered into a valid common law marriage under Pennsylvania law in Octoberġ963 (i.e., before January 1, 2005, the date after which Pennsylvania prospectivelyĪbolished common law marriage) that lasted until the NH’s death on December XX, 2020.įor this additional reason, we believe that the agency could find that Claimant and NH had a valid marriage even without a license. Thus, Pennsylvania courts are likely to find that Claimant and the Prior to January 1, 2005, theĭate after which Pennsylvania prospectively abolished common law marriage, some PennsylvaniaĬourts held that statutory marriage license requirements were “directory only” and Had a valid marriage despite the lack of a license. However, the Pennsylvania courts might nevertheless find that Claimant and the NH Because Claimant and the NH did not obtainĪ license, they did not meet the strict statutory requirements for a valid marriage. Marriage and that Claimant is thus the NH’s widow for purposes of determining herĮntitlement to WIB on the NH’s record. We believe that the agency could find that Claimant and the NH were in a valid The NH and Claimant under Pennsylvania law for purposes of determining Claimant’sĮntitlement to widow’s insurance benefits (WIB) under Title II of the Social Security Because the NH and Claimant have a Quaker Marriage Certificate,īut no Pennsylvania marriage license, you asked whether a valid marriage existed between Claimant, C~, alleges a Quaker ceremonial marriage to the Number Holder, L~ (NH),īeginning in Pennsylvania on October XX, 1963, and ending on December XX, 2020, when
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |